![]() Being fairly new to the game, he really outdid himself and created a suspense-ridden film in Coherence, especially considering that the whole film takes place in a living room and has a very low budget. ![]() This movie is a true ode to storytelling and credit has to be given to the director, James Ward Byrkit, whose only other credit for directing is Rango (he’s done some shorts and TV shows but these are his only major film credits). Not what your best self would do, but what your worst self would do. It makes you turn the microscope on yourself and ask yourself what you would do in a similar situation. It’s an interesting examination of what holds people together and what tears them apart, examining how people hold up in incredibly stressful situations. This movie is simultaneously a suspense, a thriller and a sci-fi with a healthy amount of drama mixed in. At one point in the night the power goes off and strange things start to happen, seemingly perpetuated by a meteor that is passing very closely to Earth. What happens next is a whole other story.The story surrounds eight friends who have come together for a dinner party. A committed and expressive ensemble cast keeps the fear real until daylight comes. With no knowledge of where the other actors were going during the scene, the result is a real-time, largely improvised experience. Coherence is experimental in that there was no script, just a notecard given to the actors each morning describing their character’s general motivation, plus the occasional detail to work into the dialogue. The only members of crew permitted on set during the five-night shoot were the cameramen. But Byrkit’s is a pared-down quantum physics lesson, and thanks to some colour-coded glow sticks the proposed theories are easy for the audience to follow.Įver in the background is the question: which version of ourselves would we choose, if we could? Which would we let die? There’s a pertinent discussion about Schrodinger’s Cat Theory and all sorts of alternate-reality weirdness. Meanwhile there are all sorts of handheld-camera scares and things that go bump in the dark. Initially there are all kinds of theories about what is causing all the strange incidents: Beth (Elizabeth Gracen) talks about a freaky feng shui “vortex” in the house one of the guests may be a tiny bit psychic someone else may have put an echinacea-ketamine cocktail in the food. And they return with a box full of unnerving clues. He and Amir (Alex Manugian) have seen a mirror of their dinner party: same house, same people. (Not 1984’s Night of the Comet, Valley-girl crazy, but crazy for real.) After the lights go out, Hugh (Hugo Armstrong) decides to wander over to the only lighted house in the neighbourhood and phone his astrophysicist brother, who instructed him to phone if anything seemed amiss as the comet passed. Could it have anything to do with the comet, scheduled to pass unusually close to Earth that night?Įm indulges in a little comet history and how it can make people loopy. Weird, no one else can get cell service at all. ![]() Em (Emilly Foxler) is a dancer who nearly made it Mike (Nicholas Brendan) is a TV actor no one can remember Em’s beau Kevin (Maury Serling) may still have the hots for Laurie (Lauren Mahir) assorted substance-abuse specters and career disappointments lurk just below the surface.Įm arrives at the house after having had her cellphone crack while she was holding it in her hand. Each guest has some secret regret that they bring to the table, literally. The evening begins with a typical yuppie dinner party: bring your own bottle and bring your own baggage. After a summer of blockbuster excess, it’s time for a little reminder that filmmakers can occasionally make a big splash with a drop-in-the-bucket budget.Įnter Coherence, a film written, produced and directed by James Ward Byrkit.ĭespite tight finances and tighter shooting schedule – just five nights – Byrkit has crafted a thoughtful sci-fi mystery that plays with the concepts of identity, reality and, ultimately, the importance of not getting rid of your landline.
0 Comments
There, the player will absorb Anri's Darksign, allowing them to properly usurp the First Flame after defeating The Soul of Cinder. From there, Yoel's replacement, Yuria, will instruct the player on where they may participate in a wedding ceremony. They must also be sure they DO NOT kill the hidden assassin in the Irythill chapel. To do this, it is key that the player not tell her where Horace has hollowed in the Smoldering Lake. Then, the player must follow Anri of Astora's questline, ensuring her survival until she reaches Irythill. Yoel will give the player free levels depending on how much they die, and the player must do this until Yoel can give no more levels before sadly passing away. In order to undergo the "Usurpation of Fire," the player must meet Yoel of Londor in the Undead Settlement, and exhaust his dialogue at every opportunity. The final, and most complicated ending in Dark Souls 3, requires the most effort. What follows is a grim cutscene where the player-character slays the Firekeeper in cold blood and attempts to claim the First Flame for themselves. In the brief time where the player still has control of their character while the Firekeeper does her dirty deed, they must attack her. However, things are different in Dark Souls 3. Existence itself has become weakened by this ongoing cycle after millennia of switching between them. Many people are desperate to find some way to break the cycle before everything burns down to ash.ĭark Souls 3's third ending is merely an extension of the second. Unfortunately, Dark Souls II reveals that the two ages are inescapably, unnaturally linked, and no matter which ending the player chooses the opportunity for the opposing age to arise always presents itself. In each game, the player can either extend their Age of Fire or end it. ![]() Each Dark Souls game takes place at the end of a so-called Age of Fire, where the power of the gods begins to fade, along with their civilizations, before an Age of Darkness begins. However, each has some key points of information that makes them easy to explain, and just as easy to understand.īefore Dark Souls 3's endings are explained, it's important to understand how they fit in with Dark Souls' established lore, otherwise none of them will make any sense. Dark Souls 3is perhaps the worst offender when it comes to this, with a grand total of four endings that often require completely different playthroughs to achieve. In other words, it wasn't designed with a genuine creative spark, but was just a pendulum response to fan criticism of the second game.One of the standard features of most Soulslike games are the multiple, oftentimes confusing endings that come with them. I was done with the whole "evil catholic" schtick by the end of BB.so of course it pretty much takes over DSIII as well. The boss battles are the best feature of the game, and miles ahead of II.ĭSII was criticized for really phoning in certain aspects of the game, like the boss battles, do-nothing NPC's, and the simplistic level design.ĭSIII made sure to cover these bases, and filled in the rest with weak fanservice + "new" Bloodeborne content. When you add up everything that wasn't recylced, fanservice, or "imported", thematically, from Bloodborne, you get shockingly little that is actually "new". ![]() One could write a book about how this game didn't live up to it's creative potential. It also blatantly reuses assets from Bloodborne, overuses castles and cathedrals, seemingly, because they were easier to develop with their toolsets, is the most linear souls game to date (how ironic is it that the "new" FS rips off two old Souls games.which each had incarnations that were FAR less linear), utterly botched certain features, like poise, and is - by a loooong shot - the least creative Souls game yet. ![]() ![]() They've released three games in three years, and it really shows. ![]() Kamitteru can be considered as a teiru-form of a stative verb ‘神る’ ( kamiru), and means ‘ be in the state of having Kamiru-ed (become Godlike)’. ![]() Therefore, in a formal situation, it is better to use a more standard word kamigakaru. Note, however, that some people frown upon the use of the word, critisising that its tone is sort of childish and uncool, or the usage of the word ‘God’ is inappropriate. At the end of that year, Hiroshima Toyo Carp won the Central League championship for the first time in 25 years, and that pushed ‘ kamitteru’ to be selected as the word of the year (Ryukougo Taisho). It took off among young people in 2016, when the term was used by Koichi Ogata, the head coach of a Japanese professional baseball team Hiroshima Toyo Carp, to acclaim the player Seiya Suzuki for his ‘Godlike’ performance: hitting game-winning home runs in two games back-to-back. As with kamigakaru, it literally means ‘be Godlike’, and is used very casually to describe something or someone awesome and amazing. ‘神ってる ( kamitteru)’ is a relatively new slang term, which derived from the standard word ‘ kamigakaru’ explained above. ‘うちの学園祭に乃木坂46来る とか神かよ’ (Nogizaka 46 will come to our school festival is that (situation) God?) This expression usually comes after a complete sentence or phrase, as shown in the example sentences below: This expression literally means ‘(Isn’t something or someone) God?’, and is used when something fantastic and/or unbelievable has happened. Related to the casual usage of ‘ kami‘ explained above, there is an idiomatic expression ‘とか神かよ’ ( toka kami kayo), which is often used by young people in a casual text message or posts on social media. They also use these terms to describe something superlative, as in ‘今日の嵐のライブ、マジ神だった’ (kyou no Arashi no raibu, maji kami datta) meaning ‘Arashi’s concert today was so Godlike’. ![]() Some young people say ‘神 ( kami)’ or ‘マジ神 ( maji kami)’ meaning ‘You’re God!’ or ‘You’re so Godlike when they thank their friends who have done something very nice to them, such as giving them amazing gifts or letting them copy their homework. In fact, there even exists such a word as ‘神泡 ( kami awa)’ meaning ‘top-notch foam’, which has been coined by Japanese beverage giant Suntory Holdings to describe the fine-grained creamy foam of their popular beer product “The Premium Malt’s”. The prefix ‘神’ is used very casually and affixed to many kinds of words. They include ‘神アプリ’ ( kami apuri) meaning ‘top-notch apps’, 神回 ( kami kai)’ meaning ‘a brilliant episode (of anime or TV shows)’, ‘神対応 ( kami taiou)’ meaning ‘a brilliant response’, just to name a few. There are a lot of Japanese words that contain ‘神’ ( kami) as a prefix, which means ‘top-notch’ or ‘brilliant. ![]() For example, ‘今日の彼のプレーは神がかっていた’ (kyou no kare no purei ha kamigakatte ita) means ‘His play today was ‘Godlike.’, and ‘彼女の神がかった演技に魅了された’ (kanojo no kamigakatta engi ni miryou sareta) means ‘I was fascinated by her “Godlike” performance’. Usually, it is used as an adjective in ta-form ‘神がかった’ ( kamigakatta) or te-form ‘神がかっている’ (kamigakatte iru). 神がかる ( kamigakaru) Ī Japanese word ‘神がかる’ ( kamigakaru) literally means ‘resemble God’ or ‘Godlike’, and is used when you describe something or someone extraordinary and unbelievable. Last year, Ohtani hit 20 home runs and started 10 games as a pitcher for the first time since Babe Ruth had done in 1919. The Japanese player Shoei Ohtani is often compared to Babe Ruth in that both of them are talented both as a pitcher and hitter. (note) Babe Ruth is a legendary baseball player who played about 100 years ago in the US. The direct translation of this comment is ‘ (For me) Babe Ruth is a Godlike being, and I hope to get close to him little by little’, but it was actually translated by an English translator as ‘In no way do I think I’m at his (Ruth’s) level’. For instance, Shohei Otani, a Japanese baseball player who started his career in the United States last year, said during an introductory press conference, ‘ベーブルースは神様のような存在で、少しずつ近づいていきたい’ ( Babe Ruth ha kamisama no youna sonzai de, sukoshi zutsu chikazuite ikitai). ‘神様のような存在’ (kamisama no youna sonzai) is an idiomatic expression that literally means ‘a Godlike being’, and is used when you describe someone whom you respect from the bottom of your heart.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |